Who Adapted it Best...Emma

  

          Time for another period drama review! I was going to do Pride and Prejudice next, but I was inspired by Jeanine to review Emma instead. She always gets me in the mood to watch a good period drama! I just had to go and watch Emma as soon as I read her post! 

         When it comes to adaptations of Emma we Austen fans are blessed with abundance. There have been two movie versions and one TV series, and I suppose we will have to mention the modern teen flick, Clueless, inspired by Austen's novel ( and I use the term "inspired" loosely). Lets face it Emma is  that timeless story that every movie director salivates over. So let me break down the adaptations for you.

         The newest version to date is the 2009 BBC version, directed by Jim O' Hanlon. This is a real gem. I can't even count the number of times I've watched this. This is a true adaptation of the book. Instead of stringing together scenes from the book, this version seeks to lay out the story as it happens in the novel. 

        Romola Garai is perfect as Emma, and I don't know if anyone could do better. She effortlessly balances Emma's snobbishness and whimsical girlishness. Emma is young, energetic, mischievous, and fiercely strong willed; she is a lady, but still a whole lot of fun. Okay girls, now lets focus on Jonny Lee Miller! Mr Knightly is my absolute favourite of Jane Austen's male leads. While all the rest of the girls were drooling over Mr Darcy, I was dreaming of a banter session with Mr Knightly! Mr Knightly is my man, I'm admitting it right here, right now on the internet. Oh heaven help me! I'm in love with a fictional character! And I'm in love with Miller's portrayal of him! Miller is kind, gentle, principled, down to earth, yet still approachable. Garai and Miller have great chemistry. Their relationship comes across as very natural and informal, and so it should be with two people who have supposedly grown up around each other. They joke, tease, scold, and spat with relative ease. 

        What I loved most about this version was that the supporting cast were not made redundant by the leads. What's special about Emma is that it's all about the characters and their interactions with each other. The Westons, Mr Woodhouse, The Eltons, Harriet Smith, Miss Bates, Frank Churchill, Jane Fairfax are a comical company, and are not to be separated from each other. This adaptation really highlights this and there is really strong chemistry with the whole lot of them. 

         The supporting cast are brilliant. Mr Elton is delightfully smarmy, Harriet Smith is adorable, Frank Churchill is the lovable scoundrel, Miss Bates is funny and yet surprisingly well developed (there is a particularly touching scene between her and Emma), and Jane Fairfax is a delight to watch. Also I should mention Dumbledore is in it! That is to say Michael Gambon plays Mr. Woodhouse and may I say he is fantastic. Mr Woodhouse definitely comes into his own in this one. The soundtrack is amazing, the scenery is a real treat, ( I want to live in Emma's house!), and I also want wear every single one of her dresses. To sum up this adaptation gets a big thumbs up!!

          The next adaptation came out in 1996, directed by Douglas McGrath, and stars Gwyneth Paltrow and Jeremy Northam. This is a delightful version. The mood and look of the film is so light and airy. There are so many pretty details in the sets and costumes that just scream charming. This sumptuous feast for the eyes is definitely going to lift your spirits on rainy day for sure.   

        The cast in this version doesn't seem to have the same togetherness as in the previous; the spotlight is all on Gwyneth. She is undisputedly a talented actress, and the director takes full advantage, however with all the focus on Emma, the supporting characters do suffer.  They just can't keep up with her. Gwyneth herself is a perfectly snobby, and refined Emma, but lacks warmth and spirit. 

           Jeremy Northam is an oh my gosh, hot Mr Knightly! He is a dish! I just wish he was in more scenes than he was!

         I should also mention Toni Collette as Harriet Smith and and Phyllida Law as Miss Bates. These two are hilarious  and give brilliant performances! All and all this edition of Emma is nothing remarkable but it definitely a good time.

         You have to love Andrew Davies because he truly does amazing work. He and Austen novels were made for each other. This adaptation which also came out in 1996 stars Kate Beckinsale and Mark Strong. It may not be much to look at as far as cinematography, but the script is iron tight and the acting is spot on. Kate is amazing as Emma. She is the picture of the blue-blooded heiress, but is still the mischievous girl with a lot to learn. Harriet Smith played by Samantha Morton is the perfect shy and insecure friend of Miss Woodhouse and Frank Churchill is every bit the cad. I especially loved Emma's hilarious day dream sequences in this version, it's fun to get into the ridiculous parts of Emma's mind.

        Now what didn't work? Well for a start Mrs Elton was sporting a mysterious American accent and  I was completely distracted during her scenes, and probably more annoyed than I needed to be with her character. 

The other issue I had with this version (and now this is the big one) was Mark Strong's performance as Mr Knightly. This was a total deal breaker for me. One might think he was trying to be Mr Darcy rather than Mr Knightly. He is far too cold, severe and aloof and is definitely NOT the Mr Knightly I fell in love with. Join that with the fact that Kate Beckinsale, despite her attempts, cannot conjure up chemistry between them, and you have story that fails at romance, but ticks all the right boxes in other areas. So sad!

I think you can probably guess by now that my favourite of these versions has got to be the 2009 Emma!!

          This version is very near perfection (the issues I have with it would just sound like petty nit-pickery). This version was nominated for 3 Emmys (it won an Emmy for Outstanding Hairstyling; who would have thought it!) and 2 Golden Globes nominations, and it's not hard to understand why. This  truly adapted it best!

Who Adapted it Best?..Jane Eyre

       
         Hi blog! Long time no see! I appologize profusely for my lack of activity these past two months! "Uni" has been so terribly busy, I have spent all my free time doing my homework and had no time to blog. I read somewhere recently that inactivity is basically the kiss of death for a blog, and it was just the kick in the pants motivation I needed to get back to writing.

          I've been planning this new segment on my blog for awhile now, and finally here it is:

          I've wanted to review some of my favourite period dramas for a long time, but there are so many of them, and what do you do about multiple adaptations. So this segment is where I review two adaptations of the same thing and figure out (in my opinion) which was done better. Pretty neat huh? Period dramas, and Leah's opinion about things! It's like a dream come true!!! Anyway I thought I would start with Jane Eyre. There have been so many adaptations of this amazing book, but I'm going to focus on the most recent two; the 2006 BBC dramatisation starring Ruth Wilson and Toby Stevens, and the 2011 film starring Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender.

         When it came to 2011 film, I had very low expectations. I'll let you know straight off that I adored the BBC version. To me it was completely untouchable. Also I'm not Wasikowska's biggest fan ( I never thought Alice a bland character until Waikowska took it on), and I was skeptical about her filling the role of such an emotionally complex heroine. I also felt her too pretty for the part of plain Jane.

           I ended up being blown away by this version to be honest. Director Cary Fukunaga did an amazing job keeping the story fresh while at the same time remaining true to the book. The movie is breathtakingly stunning. I watched this with two other girls, and I think every ten minutes we were commenting on how beautiful the cinematography was. 

          As for the cast; they were brilliant! I was shocked to discover that Mia Wasikowska can act! She was fantastic as Jane. She captured the bubbling, suppressed emotion, and the quiet, yet fierce will and independence from beginning to end. She was Jane. She was especially good in the parting scene (which is probably the best version I've seen), you really felt the inner struggle between her feelings and principles. When it came to Mr Rochester, it was Fassbender who ended up being too good looking for his part!! This guy practically oozed charisma throughout the film! Still, he ended up being a fine Mr Rochester.  

         The supporting cast was left with little to do, but they served their purpose. Sally Hawkins, who I'm usually a fan of, is a rather lazy Mrs Reed. Judi Dench is a little too good for the amount of screen time given to Mrs. Fairfax, and brings a little more depth and emotion to role. Jamie Bell was really good as Saint John Rivers, but we saw too little of him. The gothic element of the story could have been explored more than it was; the film was definitely not as dark as the trailer suggested. The chemistry between the two leads was a bit weak, and the ending was a little too abrupt for my liking. Keep in mind that this is a film so there are elements and characters (Grace Poole is absent from the story) which have been left out of the narrative due to time constraints. Over all though, I was pleasantly surprised at how good this version was it's one I would recommend to all literature and period drama lovers.

           Now to the BBC version! Can I say enough good things about this one?! I doubt it! Toby Stevens has been pretty much unsurpassed as Mr. Rochester. He is dark, he is broody, he is secretive, and yet charming and charismatic. Ruth Wilson is plain, passionate, witty and intelligent. This version has the gothic element down, and all the characters are intact. This adaptation also has the one thing that is sorely lacking from the film; chemistry. The two leads are made for each other, and you feel that with every look, every touch, and every word. The soundtrack is beautiful and eerie; why oh why was it never released?! But that's a rant for another day!  The cinematography is not as striking as the 2011 version, and Mrs Fairfax and Saint John Rivers are not as good. However, the characters in this adaptation, especially the leads are much better developed, and the narrative is more faithful to it's source material. This version was readily accepted as the king of all Jane Eyre adaptations that come before it, and the title was definitely deserved. 

         

           So which version will take the prize? The film with the more artistic beauty or the one with all the chemistry. I was surprised at how much I had to think about it. They were both brilliant versions that are worth seeing, but there can only be one winner. And the winner is.......

The BBC 2006 Version!!!!

I loved this version from the first time I ever saw it. It is true to the novel in both narrative and character, the acting unsurpassed, the gothic themes fully explored. It is truly the best version to date. Having said that, I would enjoy seeing either of these two versions, and would recommend seeing both.

        Can I just say that Jane Eyre is probably one of my favourite novels! I remember reading it for the first time while spending Christmas with my grandparents in Canada. I was so engrossed in it that as soon as we were finished opening presents,  I literally ran back to the book to find out what happened next. All Christmas my Nanny was constantly asking me what was happening to poor Jane. It was the last Christmas we spent with either of them, and Jane Eyre is one of the things that brings me back to that time. Isn't it great how good books become such an intricate part of our lives?!

        PS: I would love to hear back from my followers. Which one of these versions is your favourite? What was your favourite part of the book?